Utility of 3D-T2 space MRI sequence in diagnosing a rare cause of lower backache: horseshoe cord and meningocoele manqué in a case of composite split cord malformation
- 1 Radiology, Dr D Y Patil Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Pune, Maharashtra, India
- 2 Radiology, Mahatma Gandhi Mission's Institute of Health Sciences, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Correspondence to Dr Pranav Ajmera; pranavajmera@gmail.com
Abstract
Diastematomyelia is the asymmetric or symmetric lateral duplication of the spinal cord into two hemicords. Pang divided it into three types: type-1, type-2 and composite split cord malformation (SCM). Composite SCMs are uncommon and are defined by the coexistence of multiple types of split cord with normal cord in between. When partially bridged, they are called a horseshoe cord. We report a case of a young woman who presented with backache and was diagnosed with composite SCM with horseshoe cord and type-2 SCM with intervening normal cord. In our case, 3D-SPACE due to its superior topographical evaluation, allowed us to visualise and characterise the thin meningocoele manque bands and detect horseshoe cords, asymmetric cords and demarcate the precise extent of syrinx, which were suboptimally imaged on isolated T2 and T1WI sequences. If left untreated during surgery, bands can be the potential cause for persistent backache.
Background
Dimyelia refers to the complete duplication of spinal cord while diplomyelia refers to a ventral or dorsal accessory spinal cord to the normal cord.1 Diastematomyelia (DSM) (split cord malformation (SCM)) is the asymmetric or symmetric lateral duplication of the spinal cord into two hemicords. The word diastematomyelia was coined by Ollivier in his critique on the disease of the spinal cord published in 1837.2 Each of the hemicord contains a dorsal and a ventral nerve root.3
As per the widely followed Pang classification, SCM can be broadly subclassified as type-1 and type-2.4 Type-1 SCM has two hemicords within distinct dural sacs separated by intervening fibrous, cartilaginous or osseous spurs (figures 1A and 2A). Type-2 SCM has two hemicords within a single dural tube separated by a fibrous median septum (figures 1B and 2B). Embryologically, it is caused by ectoderm–endoderm adhesion, which leads to the formation of an accessory neurenteric canal. Around this canal, an endo-mesenchymal tract forms, which bisects the developing notochord, resulting in two hemineural plates. Endo-mesenchymal tract forms bony septum and fibrous band in type-1 (figure 3B) and type-2 SCM (figure 3C), respectively. Two distinct types of SCM with an intervening normal cord in the same patient are known as composite types of SCM. These are caused by ecto-endodermal adhesions and endo-mesenchymal tracts in two separate locations. A diagrammatic representation of the entire working process and factors contributing to the embryogenesis of this lesion has been depicted in figure 4.
An artists’ rendering of the two major types of split cord malformation (SCM) visualised through a cross section in a longitudinal orientation. (A) represents a type-1 SCM consisting of two hemicords, each contained within its own dural tube and separated by a dura-sheathed rigid osseocartilaginous median; (B) represents a type-2 SCM consisting of two hemicords housed in a single dural tube separated by a non-rigid, fibrous median septum. Image: Designed by Dr Pranav Ajmera and artistically hand drawn by Ms Vidisha Nair (third-year undergraduate student at Dr D Y Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Center, Pune).
An artists’ rendering of the two major types of split cord malformation (SCM) visualised through a cross-section in an axial orientation. (A) represents a type-1 SCM consisting of two hemicords, each contained within its own dural tube and separated by a dura-sheathed rigid osseocartilaginous median; (B) represents a type-2 SCM consisting of two hemicords housed in a single dural tube separated by a non-rigid, fibrous median septum. Image: Designed by Dr Pranav Ajmera and skillfully represented artistically by Ms Vidisha Nair (third-year undergraduate student at Dr D Y Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Center, Pune). CSF, cerebro-spinal fluid.
A diagram depicting the normal process of embryogenesis in (A) and the abnormal process of development of the endomesenchymal tract which lead to formation of type-1 split cord malformation (SCM) (B) and type-2 SCM (C). Image: Designed by Dr Pranav Ajmera and skillfully represented artistically by Ms Vidisha Nair (third-year undergraduate student at Dr D Y Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Center, Pune).
A flowchart representing the main theories behind the embryogenesis of the split cord malformation (SCM). The development of SCM types is dependent on multiple factors occurring at a specific time when the central nervous system of the fetus is developing. Image: Design and representation by Dr Pranav Ajmera and Dr Snehal Rathi (MGM Institute of Health Sciences, Navi Mumbai).
SCM may manifest with other associated findings, one of which is meningocoele manqué (MM). MM can be seen in type-2 SCM in which abnormal bands are seen which adhere to the dura causing cord tethering. Existing literature suggests that they are seen in nearly one-fifth of type-2 SCM, but the actual incidence maybe more as they are not always well appreciable on conventional sequences.3 5 One of the hemicords may have a syrinx or teratoma. Hemimyelocele or hemimyelo-meningocoele occurs when one of the hemicords undergoes a localised defect in neural folding and formation between post-ovulatory day 22–28. This embryological event is distinct to the above process of SCM, the reason why their co-existence is all the more rarer1 3 5
Our case of composite SCM is unique as there is a horseshoe cord (incomplete separation of cord) and type-2 SCM (with asymmetric cords) with intervening normal cord.
Case presentation
A young woman in her mid-20s presented with mid and lower backache, more on the left side, since 1 year associated with tingling in the left foot. There was no history of trauma, fever and weight loss. There was no significant medical history or presence of any associated comorbidities. On clinical assessment, the power in all four limbs was 5/5, with all reflexes intact and nothing out of the ordinary. Consequently, as part of the usual protocol of evaluating causes of backache, the patient was advised an MRI dorsal–lumbar spine (which includes routine T1WI/T2WI longitudinal and axial sections).
Investigations
MRI
MRI of dorsolumbar spine and whole spine screening was done which showed scoliosis in the dorsal spine with convexity towards the right in upper dorsal spine and convexity towards left in mid and lower dorsal spine. Conus was noted at the level of L2 vertebra; syringomyelia was noted in the dorsal cord at D3 to D5 levels (figure 5A-C). 3D-T2-WI-SPACE sequence was obtained as complete division of hemicords was not appreciated on routine T2-WI sequence. 3D T2-WI-SPACE sequence could detect both horseshoe cord and MM. An incomplete split cord (horseshoe cord) was noted at the D6 vertebra to D7–D8 disc level (figures 6 and 7A-C). Again split cord was noted at D12–L1 disc level to the superior border of the L2 vertebra (with no demonstrable osteocartilaginous bar between the two hemicords), beyond which a single cord was noted up to conus medullaris; both the hemicords appeared asymmetric, the left hemicord appeared larger than the right hemicord (figure 8A-C). The intervening cord appeared single; no bony or cartilaginous bar was noted at both levels. Posterior neural arches appeared malformed at L3–L4 levels. Bifid posterior spinous processes were noted at L3 and L4 levels. The rudimentary disc was noted at the D1–D2 level, suggestive of congenital block vertebrae. Posterior paraspinal muscles appeared atrophic at L3–L4 levels, more on the right side. The rest of the spinal cord and spine appeared normal. A diagnosis of multilevel diastematomyelia (composite SCM) type-3 SCM was made. MM was noted at D5 and L2 levels extending from the dorsal surface of the cord towards the dorsal dura (figure 9A-C). Contrast scan was not done and is not necessary, as administration of contrast will not reveal any novel information.
3D-T2-WI SPACE sequence: (A) (sagittal), (B) (coronal), (C) (axial) dorsal spine showing syrinx at D3–D5 levels (marked by black arrow) at scoliosis with convexity towards right in upper dorsal spine.
3D-T2-WI SPACE sequence: (A) (sagittal), (B) (coronal), (C) (axial) dorsal spine showing incomplete split cord (horseshoe cord) at D6 vertebral body to D7–D8 intervertebral disc level (marked by black arrow).
3D-T2-WI SPACE sequence: (A) (sagittal), (B) (coronal), (C) (axial) dorsal spine showing normal intervening cord (marked by black arrow) between horseshoe cord and diastematomyelia.
3D-T2-WI SPACE sequence: (A) (sagittal), (B) (coronal), (C) (axial) dorsal spine showing type-2 diastematomyelia with asymmetric hemicords at levels D12–L1 intervertebral disc levels to superior border of L2 vertebra (marked by black arrow).
3D-T2-WI SPACE sequence: (A) (sagittal), (B) (axial dorsal spine), (C) (axial lumbar spine) showing meningocoele manqué at D5 and L2 vertebral body levels, extending from dorsal surface of the cord towards the dorsal dura (marked by black arrow).
CT scan
CT scan of the spine revealed rudimentary discs at the D1–D2, D4–D5 and D5–D6 levels. Posterior neural arches appear fused at these levels, suggestive of congenital block vertebrae. Posterior neural arches of L2 and L3 vertebrae were malformed. The spinous process of L3, L5 and S2 vertebrae appeared bifid. Spina bifida was noted at L4 and S1 levels (figure 10A-D). The spinous process was absent at S3–S5 levels. No obvious bony or cartilaginous bar was noted in the spinal canal in the dorsal and lumbar region. Scoliosis was noted in the dorsal spine with convexity towards the right in the upper dorsal spine and convexity towards the left in the mid and lower dorsal spine. Findings were suggestive of multiple anomalies in the lumbar and sacral vertebrae.
Plain CT of dorsolumbar spine (A—sagittal 2D-MPR) showing rudimentary discs at D1–D2, D4–D5 and D5–D6 levels (marked by black arrow); (B–D) (axial) showing malformed posterior neural arches at L2 level (marked by black arrow) and bifid spinous process at L3 vertebral level and spina bifida at L4 vertebral level (marked by black arrow).
Treatment
The patient was advised to undergo a surgical correction of SCM to dissect the MM band and relieve back pain, however, the patient was reluctant against undergoing an operative management because of her young age.
Outcome and follow-up
The patient was discharged after the diagnosis was established on MRI and was asked to follow-up after 1 year or sooner in case the pain increased or the patient was ready to be operated on.
Discussion
Technique (3D-T2-SPACE sequence)
3D-SPACE sequence is a rapid and efficient T2 sequence for evaluation of diastematomyelia extent, symmetric or asymmetric cords, horseshoe cord, extent of syrinx and associated thin MM bands. It is an advanced MRI technique which can produce high-resolution isotropic images which are less sensitive to flow, chemical shift and susceptibility artefacts. 3D-SPACE has an excellent ability to resolve T2 contrast which renders it the ability to distinguish superiorly cerebrospinal fluid from other structures. 3D isotropic data allows reconstruction of the images in multiple planes which are extremely useful for diagnosis and for surgical management.6 SPACE allows a superior topographical evaluation–visualisation of spinal cord tethering and adhesions. These findings have paramount surgical relevance when planning surgery for such a case, as if left undiagnosed and uncorrected, these can potentially cause persistent postoperative pain and discomfort to the patient.7 In our case 3D-SPACE, allowed us to visualise and characterise the thin MM bands and detect horseshoe cord which were not appreciated on the isolated T2 and T1WI sequences. The 3D-SPACE sequence was in fact done especially in a second sitting retrospectively to evaluate for the presence of these SCM associated lesions.
SCM description
SCM of the composite type is extremely rare, with only a few cases reported to date. In the literature, less than 1% of overall SCM cases were found to have composite type of SCM.8 9 The terms composite and compound are used interchangeably. The presence of multiple types of split chord characterises SCMs. At the same or separate levels, it can be type-1 or type-2, or a combination of both.10 Rarely, the division of the cord is unclear when the two hemicords are partially abridged, resulting in a horseshoe cord. Other forms of occult dysraphism, such as lipoma, dermoid, epidermoid, teratoma and sinus tract, are associated with composite lesions.11 12
SCM type-1 constitutes 40%–50% of SCM. It is usually associated with hyperplastic laminae and widening of interpedicular distance. The dural sac is always double, with two separate cords, and the spinal canal is divided into two symmetrical halves by an extradural bony or cartilaginous bar (as depicted in figures 1A and 2A), which can be tilted in the axial plane, resulting in an asymmetric partition of the canal. In such situations, the cord can be asymmetric with one of the cords appearing hypoplastic. Lumbar region is the most common location of spur followed by lower dorsal, cervical and upper dorsal regions, respectively. Double-level spurs are occasionally found. The two cords can extend over multiple segments and reunite caudally with the spur in the crouch on rare occasions.
SCM type-2 constitutes 50%–60% of SCM and is characterised by two symmetric or asymmetric hemicords in a single dural sac. There can be an antero-posterior fibrous band in between the two cords tethering the cords to the dura (as depicted in figures 1B and 2B).
Simultaneous development of neural and vertebral elements, leads to association of intraspinal anomalies like SCM with spinal deformities like congenital scoliosis and kyphosis.1 3 12 This was seen in our case.
MM description
According to James and Lassman’s original definition, MM is defined as the tethering of the spinal cord, nerve roots or filum terminale against the inner dorsal portion of the dura mater by fibrous bands, aberrant nerve roots and/or adhesions.13 It’s strongly associated with type-2 SCM. MM may be present in one-fifth of type-2 SCM. An overlying cigarette burn mark on the skin may be seen in 50% of instances.14 MM is a short tethering tract that terminates within the dura mater, epidural space or lamina, according to Rajpal.15 Long tethering tracts are tracts that end at the skin’s surface.
Peripheral nerves and ganglion cells, adipose tissue, blood vessels, epidermal cells, cartilage or bone, smooth muscle, central nervous system tissue and dermal/epidermal cyst elements can all be found in these tethering bands, in descending order of frequency, on histopathology.16 17 The most common constituent tissue is fibrous tissue. Usually the MM bands extend between dorsal surface of spinal cord to inner aspect of the dorsal dura. Sometimes, these may further extend through the dorsal dura mater upto underside of the lamina or within the surrounding fibrous tissue.14 15 While lumbar canal has been documented as the most common site of MM, it can rarely be seen in other regions also. These are seen as thin bands appearing isointense to the spinal cord on T1WI and hypointense to the spinal cord on T2WI. SCM, atretic meningocoeles and lipomas in lumbosacral region can be seen as associated findings.1 16 17
Clinical presentation and final management
The actual clinical presentation of the patients of SCM is highly variable, ranging from asymptomatic in half the patient population to symptomatic spectrum where they usually present with neurological and urological manifestations.
Factors contributing to the symptomatic presentation of the patient are associated with the presence of bony septum which prevents its normal developmental ascension with time, thus leading to tethering. Tethering of the cord is associated with back pain and can also lead to a compromise in the blood flow thus leading to tissue ischaemia.
Early surgical correction is usually recommended by the treating clinician. However, the type of split plays a major role in deciding the management. It is highly advisable for the patient to undergo surgery prophylactically in all asymptomatic cases of type-1 SCM while a conservative approach can be used in type-2 SCM. Preoperative condition of the patient has a significant impact on post-operative outcome. Intraoperatively monitoring continuously the neurophysiological status is also associated with better postoperative outcomes. Fluoroscopy can localise the level of the bony septum in type-1 SCM and site of the split in type-2 SCM. Laminotomy or laminectomy is undertaken a level above or below the septum in type-1 and at the level of the split and one level above or below as needed in type-1. The presence of syringomyelia does not have an impact on the clinical course of SCM and hence, it should not play a definitory role in surgically treating SCM.
Postoperatively, patients may show worsening of their neurological symptoms or may develop new onset deficits. These primarily include loss of sensations, neuropathic pain, urinary retention, bowel incontinence and paraparesis. However, mostly these complications are transient and the functions recover soon after surgery.16 18
Patient’s perspective
In the patients own words, ‘I have been having backache for quite some time now, and had earlier visited my local doctor in my village but the pain persisted and so my brother brought me to this hospital for treatment. I have been told a diagnosis which took some time for me to understand, sometimes I wonder why did I develop such a condition, despite not having any other complaint in the past, and all my relatives too being healthy, none have been diagnosed with such a condition. While the doctors have advised me surgery to relieve the mild intensity but chronic back pain, I’m not married yet and will want to avoid surgery till I have my husbands’ approval’.
Learning points
-
Composite split cord malformation (SCM) and horseshoe cord (incomplete separation of cord) occurring together in a patient are extremely rare.
-
Meningocoele manqué (MM) is defined as the tethering of the spinal cord, nerve roots or filum terminale against the inner dorsal portion of the dura mater by fibrous bands, aberrant nerve roots and/or adhesions and nearly one-fifth of type-2 SCM cases may harbour MM bands. It is important to diagnose these bands as these are often the cause of back pain rather than the split cord.
-
Embryogenetically, the formation of SCM is a consequence of multiple factors leading to abnormal development of the endomesenchymal tract.
-
The 3D-T2WI-SPACE sequence should be used in all cases of SCM where incomplete separation of the cord is suspected and to detect MM in type-2 SCM as this has extreme utility for the operating surgeon and can likely reduce postoperative morbidity of the patient.
Ethics statements
Patient consent for publication
Acknowledgments
As mentioned in the separately attached cover letter, to ensure blinding.
Footnotes
-
Contributors SMK: First made the diagnosis, conceived the idea, methodology, involved in drafting the original manuscript, reviewing and overall supervision. PA: Performed investigation (followed-up the case), involved in drafting the original manuscript, reviewing, methodology, visualisation of the outline and conception of the diagrams and flowchart. SR: Involved in reviewing and editing the manuscript, conception of the diagrams and flowchart.
-
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
-
Case reports provide a valuable learning resource for the scientific community and can indicate areas of interest for future research. They should not be used in isolation to guide treatment choices or public health policy.
-
Competing interests None declared.
-
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
- © BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
References
Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer